[Xitami] Imatix Xitami If-Modified-Since RemoteBuffer OverflowVulnerability

[Magnus Wedberg]

Pieter Hintjens wrote, On 2007-10-03 09:34:
> On 10/2/07, Magus <magus1011 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I know Xitami is dead in the sense that iMatix won't continue developing it
>>> - beyond the occassional patch - but what kind of cost is required to put
>>> life back into Xitami?
> 
> :-/  Surely there are alternatives to Xitami?

Actually there is a great alternative, and that is lighttpd, which is 
actively developed and have pretty much exactly the same design goals as 
Xitami once had. Especially for Linux the choice is clear, the Windows 
port isn't super hot (but works and is getting better).

-- 
Magnus Wedberg
http://www.magnuswedberg.com/
mw AT 9000.org
Warning! Objects in viewfinder may be closer than they appear.