From nonlin at erols.com  Tue Aug  1 01:09:21 2006
From: nonlin at erols.com (nonlin)
Date: Mon Jul 31 22:12:31 2006
Subject: [Xitami] I just Lost my abitly to run Scripts.
References: <003901c6b3a7$a4c19c20$6801a8c0@earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <001c01c6b4f6$5c232740$6801a8c0@earthlink.net>

Dear All,

    It Looks Like I finger this out on my Own. I have Discovered that my AutoExec Bat had been Destroyed and so with no pathing info being set up on start up. xitami could not find what it needed to run my scripts from a command line point of view. 

If I have overlooked anything while I was fixing this situation, please let me know, Mean while everything is working Fine.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: nonlin 
  To: xitami@lists.xitami.org 
  Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:13 AM
  Subject: [Xitami] I just Lost my abitly to run Scripts.


  I am running: Xitiami v2.4d9 
  on Win 98
  I am using Purl (can't give you the version because of this problem? I think its 6)

  So Story,
  I have been running this set up for a couple of years and it has worked perfectly, no problems.
  then a few days ago I was testing an old script I had written (on this same system) that lets the user upload files to a server, but the length of the files were 0bits even though this had worked fine before. But that not the real Problem.

  The Real Problem happened today!
  The Server has stopped running any of my purl scripts. and for no reason, I almost never touch anything in the control panel and have not even opened it for atleast a year. I have check perl and it dos run from Dos. I have re-installed xitami Raw, I can log onto its Control panel, I can open HTML pages in the CGI-BIN directory though the server. But when I submit something that worked Yesterday (or was written over a Year ago) I get the standard (500 Can't find File Error) and it comes up really fast. Hear are some stuff from the Logs 

  example: log_in.html call acount_prosser.pl using get method.

  request.log
  GET /cgi-bin/nlcart/underground_a/accounts_panel/acount_prosser.pl?log_username=a&log_password=a&B1=Log+In&pageid=login HTTP/1.1
  Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/msword, */*
  Referer: http://localhost\cgi-bin\nlcart\underground_a\accounts_panel\log_in.html
  Accept-Language: en-us
  Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
  User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)
  Host: localhost
  Connection: Keep-Alive
  Authorization: Basic bm9ubGluOmdvZm9ydGg=


  Header.log
  HTTP/1.0 500 Internal error
  Server: Xitami
  Content-Length: 159
  Content-Type: text/html

  <HTML><TITLE>Error</TITLE><BODY><H1>

  The function you requested is not implemented

  <BR>Cannot create CGI process - program not found</H1></BODY></HTML>



  Someone Please get back to me because I am really Stuck.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  --
  Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
  To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.imatix.org/pipermail/xitami/attachments/20060731/fb0a8bd9/attachment.htm
From ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net  Wed Aug  2 05:41:43 2006
From: ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net (Ron Ackerman)
Date: Wed Aug  2 05:36:35 2006
Subject: [Xitami] New Server 
In-Reply-To: <BAY124-W377947126BAAD5DD249A8E85C0@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <20060802033630.QPEP12906.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>

I just wanted to say that I have a new (6 months old) Windows 2003 Server
with Apache, but I'm not real happy with Apache. I have Xitami on my home
box and I find it so much easier to work with and it does almose everything
I want it to do short of ASP. I think I'm going to scrap Apache and run with
Xitami I know many of you will praise the idea but I would like to see the
pros and cons. Honest opinions guys!

 

Ron

 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/404 - Release Date: 7/31/2006
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.imatix.org/pipermail/xitami/attachments/20060801/9a9f94c4/attachment.html
From xitami at pastryworld.ca  Wed Aug  2 05:53:38 2006
From: xitami at pastryworld.ca (Johannes Prost)
Date: Wed Aug  2 05:54:26 2006
Subject: [Xitami] New Server
In-Reply-To: <20060802033630.QPEP12906.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>
References: <BAY124-W377947126BAAD5DD249A8E85C0@phx.gbl>
	<20060802033630.QPEP12906.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>
Message-ID: <.24.72.112.29.1154490818.squirrel@webmail.pastryworld.ca>

Ron,

it's not the answer you are looking for, but I just read today a little
about JSP (Java Servlet Pages) which does the same as ASP, as I understood
it correct. I don't have any clue of ASP /JSP but would JSP be not an
alternative ?

Johannes


> I just wanted to say that I have a new (6 months old) Windows 2003 Server
> with Apache, but I'm not real happy with Apache. I have Xitami on my home
> box and I find it so much easier to work with and it does almose
> everything
> I want it to do short of ASP. I think I'm going to scrap Apache and run
> with
> Xitami I know many of you will praise the idea but I would like to see the
> pros and cons. Honest opinions guys!
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/404 - Release Date: 7/31/2006
>
>
>
> --
> Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami
>


From rolinger1 at hotmail.com  Thu Aug  3 21:11:01 2006
From: rolinger1 at hotmail.com (rpo)
Date: Thu Aug  3 21:17:05 2006
Subject: [Xitami] Xitaimi Bug ?? calling URLs twice
Message-ID: <BAY105-DAV16527E6072EA82967B2329F8530@phx.gbl>

I am not certain if this is a problem of Xitami or not, but I am beggining
to think it is.  Here is the situation.

On a Frame page labeled "mainDisplay" page is:
<head>
      <script language="JavaScript">
         function countStat() {
            parent.mainDisplay.statPage.location =
"/cgi-bin/countStat.pl?cid=4&amp;fid=42&amp;pid=6746" ;
         }
      </script>
</head>

And then in the BODY i have:

<input type="image" onClick="javascript:countStat();"
SRC="/images/gifs/playpause.gif" border="0" height="12" title="Play/Pause">
<IFRAME NAME="statPage" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" margin="0" width="1"
height="1" SRC="/blank.html"></IFRAME>

When the user clicks the button, the JS functions calls the defined URL to
the IFrame, the called URL runs a script that counts the button click to a
DB.  Normally, the iFrame is hidden (note the iframe elements), but for
testing I expanded the iFrame to: width="150" height="25" and then printed
out the results of the mysql query and click count.  As an example, if the
current DB.table.buttonClick = 10, then I would get the buttonClick
variable, print it, increment it, rewrite it to the DB and then print the
incremented variable.  So on the in the iFrame I would see: "10 and 11".  I
then go and look at the mysql table.buttonClick value, and it shows "12".

After many frustrating hours of troubleshooting, I found that the mysql logs
show the "increment" happening twice (update table set
buttonClick=buttonClick+1 where ...).  I then looked at the Xitami
access.log and discovered that everytime the "image" is clicked, the script
is running TWICE.  Somehow one button click using onClick is causing the
script to be called and run twice, thus the buttonClick value is being
incremeted by two on every click.

For the life of me i can't figure out why its occuring twice.  Even more, if
it was being called twice IN the iFrame, then the printed variables would
be: "10 and 11" followed by a "11 and 12"...but the results are always from
the first time its run, in this example it would always show "10 and 11".
Because I never see the results of the second run ("11 and 12") it is making
me believe the Xitami is somehow calling the script twice but only sending
the results of the first call to the iFrame window.   I can't think of or
see any other explanation as to why this is happening.

Any insights into this problem are highly welcomed and needed.   I wonder if
anyone else can replicate this problem....I firmly believe this is somehow
related to Xitami handling frame URL calls.  There is nothing in my HTML
that indicates one button click would cause the script to be called twice.

Thanks everyone,
Russel

PS: Assuming I can get all this to work, this method is a neat little trick
that replaces SSI (server side includes) and allows me to do statistical
tracking well beyond SSI capabilities.

From ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net  Thu Aug  3 23:09:05 2006
From: ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net (Ron Ackerman)
Date: Thu Aug  3 23:04:03 2006
Subject: [Xitami] New Server
In-Reply-To: <.24.72.112.29.1154490818.squirrel@webmail.pastryworld.ca>
Message-ID: <20060803210346.LCFV29892.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>

Johannes,

I would really like to see more about JSP if it will do the same as ASP that
is very interesting. Are  you sayin that you can run ASP script in it?

Ron 


Ron,

it's not the answer you are looking for, but I just read today a little
about JSP (Java Servlet Pages) which does the same as ASP, as I understood
it correct. I don't have any clue of ASP /JSP but would JSP be not an
alternative ?

Johannes


> I just wanted to say that I have a new (6 months old) Windows 2003 
> Server with Apache, but I'm not real happy with Apache. I have Xitami 
> on my home box and I find it so much easier to work with and it does 
> almose everything I want it to do short of ASP. I think I'm going to 
> scrap Apache and run with Xitami I know many of you will praise the 
> idea but I would like to see the pros and cons. Honest opinions guys!
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/404 - Release Date: 
> 7/31/2006
>
>
>
> --
> Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support To unsubscribe: 
> http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami
>


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/2006
 

From marky_mumpet at hotmail.com  Thu Aug  3 23:07:06 2006
From: marky_mumpet at hotmail.com (Markus Ripley)
Date: Thu Aug  3 23:07:10 2006
Subject: [Xitami] Xitami.net
Message-ID: <BAY124-W6203961B1D08330703704E8530@phx.gbl>

I just wondered has anyone else had trouble with this program trying to register your website??
mine comes up witha  message after you say what name you'd like for your website and your e-mail and then it  sends something toa  server and says it can't recieve the reply does anyone know why??




----------------------------------------
> From: ronackgen01@bellsouth.net
> To: xitami@lists.xitami.org
> Subject: RE: [Xitami] New Server
> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:09:05 -0400
> 
> Johannes,
> 
> I would really like to see more about JSP if it will do the same as ASP that
> is very interesting. Are  you sayin that you can run ASP script in it?
> 
> Ron 
> 
> 
> Ron,
> 
> it's not the answer you are looking for, but I just read today a little
> about JSP (Java Servlet Pages) which does the same as ASP, as I understood
> it correct. I don't have any clue of ASP /JSP but would JSP be not an
> alternative ?
> 
> Johannes
> 
> 
> > I just wanted to say that I have a new (6 months old) Windows 2003 
> > Server with Apache, but I'm not real happy with Apache. I have Xitami 
> > on my home box and I find it so much easier to work with and it does 
> > almose everything I want it to do short of ASP. I think I'm going to 
> > scrap Apache and run with Xitami I know many of you will praise the 
> > idea but I would like to see the pros and cons. Honest opinions guys!
> >
> >
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/404 - Release Date: 
> > 7/31/2006
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support To unsubscribe: 
> > http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/2006
>  
> 
> 
> --
> Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami

_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
From mw at 9000.org  Fri Aug  4 08:02:10 2006
From: mw at 9000.org (Magnus Wedberg)
Date: Fri Aug  4 08:02:37 2006
Subject: [Xitami] New Server
In-Reply-To: <20060803210346.LCFV29892.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>
References: <.24.72.112.29.1154490818.squirrel@webmail.pastryworld.ca>
Message-ID: <44D2FF02.31091.D32A5@mw.9000.org>

> I would really like to see more about JSP if it will do the same as
> ASP that is very interesting. Are  you sayin that you can run ASP
> script in it?

JSP is simply another way to get server side processing. It is not 
compatible in any way, shape or form with ASP. However, you canuse 
Chilisoft ASP (now SunONE ASP) to get ASP support on non-MS servers:
http://www.sun.com/software/chilisoft/

The problem with Xitami and all server side stuff (ASP, PHP, JSP) is 
that it runs the interpreters as CGI processes, meaning it has to 
start a new process for every request. This kills performance with 
slower servers or busy sites.

I would run PHP with Xitami. I don't trust JSP and ASP is 
proprietary. 
 
-- 
Magnus Wedberg
http://www.magnuswedberg.com/  -- NEW and improved!
mw AT 9000.org
Warning! Objects in viewfinder may be closer than they appear.



From ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net  Fri Aug  4 23:03:58 2006
From: ronackgen01 at bellsouth.net (Ron Ackerman)
Date: Fri Aug  4 22:58:54 2006
Subject: [Xitami] New Server
In-Reply-To: <44D2FF02.31091.D32A5@mw.9000.org>
Message-ID: <20060804205841.SFVS11609.ibm61aec.bellsouth.net@ronscomputer>

I get so many requst for ASP compatibility I had to get a server that will
run it and I'm trying Apache/ASP but I'm not real happy with it. I may end
up doing (YUK) IIS just so I can have the ASP functionality I need.  I've
been requestion Xitami ASP for years now and still don't have a good
solution. On my home box I run Xitami and IIS on another port. Not a great
solution. 

Ron


-----Original Message-----
From: xitami-bounces@lists.xitami.org
[mailto:xitami-bounces@lists.xitami.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Wedberg
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:02 AM
To: Xitami Users General Discussion
Subject: RE: [Xitami] New Server

> I would really like to see more about JSP if it will do the same as 
> ASP that is very interesting. Are  you sayin that you can run ASP 
> script in it?

JSP is simply another way to get server side processing. It is not
compatible in any way, shape or form with ASP. However, you canuse Chilisoft
ASP (now SunONE ASP) to get ASP support on non-MS servers:
http://www.sun.com/software/chilisoft/

The problem with Xitami and all server side stuff (ASP, PHP, JSP) is that it
runs the interpreters as CGI processes, meaning it has to start a new
process for every request. This kills performance with slower servers or
busy sites.

I would run PHP with Xitami. I don't trust JSP and ASP is proprietary. 
 
--
Magnus Wedberg
http://www.magnuswedberg.com/  -- NEW and improved!
mw AT 9000.org
Warning! Objects in viewfinder may be closer than they appear.




--
Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/407 - Release Date: 8/3/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/407 - Release Date: 8/3/2006
 

From paulpp at iname.com  Sun Aug  6 01:59:34 2006
From: paulpp at iname.com (Pavel Podvoiski)
Date: Sun Aug  6 01:59:40 2006
Subject: [Xitami] RE: Xitaimi Bug ?? calling URLs twice
Message-ID: <20060805235934.20B0C1CE304@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com>

Russel,
Xitami does no JavaScript or Frame processing whatsoever. It's pure client side technology.
Can it be that your browser so smart, that it remembers that content of IFRAME is no longer "blank.htm" and while rerendering page calls IFRAME with new CGI URL... again?


-- 
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/

From rolinger1 at hotmail.com  Sun Aug  6 02:23:25 2006
From: rolinger1 at hotmail.com (RPO)
Date: Sun Aug  6 02:23:58 2006
Subject: [Xitami] RE: Xitaimi Bug ?? calling URLs twice
References: <20060805235934.20B0C1CE304@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com>
Message-ID: <BAY105-DAV173AF29C9349F1FB7977F2F8560@phx.gbl>

I have since learned its not a Xitami issue but it is a problem related to
the browsers.  IE/NS and FF all do the same thing and call the URL twice to
the iFrame.  I don't know why or how though.  The best I have been able to
research is that it has something to do with httprequest processing the URL,
then the a second time to pass it the iFrame.  Or rather vise versa - the
first run of the script writes the correct printed variables to the browser
window, but then the database always shows the count one higher than it
should be, which means the second run of the script isn't getting passed to
the browser - but something else is calling it and causing the script to
execute a second time.

Not many documented cases (google search) of people discovering this problem
and I haven't been able to come up with a fix.  But this problem can be
replicated using iframes anywhere.  I have been trying to get others to
create a test page with an iframe to replicate what I have found, and then
check their web logs to see that one click to the iframe is calling the URL
twice.

Because I am using this method as a client side statistics counter (written
to a db), my numbers are double what they should.  I suppose I could always
divide by two to get the accurate number, but I don't like the fact that the
URL (a script) is getting executed twice - processor and memory usage
becomes a problem during heavy loads.

-Russel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pavel Podvoiski" <paulpp@iname.com>
To: <xitami@lists.xitami.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject: [Xitami] RE: Xitaimi Bug ?? calling URLs twice


Russel,
Xitami does no JavaScript or Frame processing whatsoever. It's pure client
side technology.
Can it be that your browser so smart, that it remembers that content of
IFRAME is no longer "blank.htm" and while rerendering page calls IFRAME with
new CGI URL... again?


-- 
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/


--
Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami