[Xitami] Status of Xitami ??

[Ted Leeuwesteijn]

Hello Thomas J. Hruska you emitted about Re: [Xitami] Status of Xitami ??

>>I am one of the fortunate ppl that doesn't depend on either linux or 
>Windows.
>>Xitami fits very well in the BeOS userfriendly envirement. Hardly any 
>>noticeble problems with it.

>Well, to be perfectly honest, there are zero web servers out there that are
>"user-friendly."  By user-friendly, I mean that I can sit the average
>computer user down in front of a computer and tell them to run ProtoNova,
>or Xitami, or IIS, or Apache, or iWeb, etc.  If it were between Xitami,
>ProtoNova, IIS, and Apache, ProtoNova has the best _chance_ of working for
>the user the first time.  The fact you use BeOS suggests to me you are a
>power user and fall into the "tinkerer" category.  Over the past 3-4 years,
>I have learned again what it truly means to be a user of a computer.  I am
>a programmer by nature, but studying user habits has been a trait of mine.
>Tinkerer/power user/etc. and user-friendly have two totally different
>meanings to me.
>
I rest my case,
My apologies if my 3 lines about my preference were out of the mailinglist 
main topic.

Grts
Ted.