[Xitami] Status of Xitami ??

[Paulo Silva]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Craig Morrison" <craighp@2cah.com>
To: <xitami@lists.xitami.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Xitami] Status of Xitami ??


> Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> > protocol handlers, a fully portable server.  Today Apache 2 is a fast,
> > portable server and seriously: you should be using Apache 2 instead of
Xitami
> > unless there are specific things Xitami does better for you.
>
> This I take issue with.
>
> Apache does not run "out of the box". Xitami does.
>
> Apache is a horrid mess (no offense Apache folks) of configuration
> options, files, etc. Xitami has a clean and (most importantly) easy
> configuration that most can figure out just by looking at it.
>
I agree with Craig here.
I have Xitami for 4/5 years also, i just got my brand new Suse Linux 9.1
where Apache2 is included, but my web server will stay Xitami on a W2k box.
If i move to the Linux box, i'll put Xitami there also.

Paulo Silva