[Xitami] Xitami and PHP (fwd)

Brian {Hamilton Kelly} xitami@lists.xitami.org
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:00:35 +0100 (BST)


Has anyone else seen this sort of stupidity when they post articles to
the list?  Quite frankly, I'm not going to play games with idiots who
so badly/sadly misconfigure their anti-spam measures that a post through
a mailing list becomes a false positive.  Especially, I'm not going to
visit a web-site which might just be a mechanism for harvesting known-
to-be-working e-mail addresses, perhaps even without the knowledge of
this mailing list subscriber.

If others have had such nonsensical "rejections" then perhaps the list
owner needs to have a quiet little word in the earhole of Erv.

Forwarded message follows:

> To: Brian {Hamilton Kelly} <bhk@dsl.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Re: [Xitami] Xitami and PHP
> From: Spam Interceptor <devnull@si20.com>
> Message-Id: <E1BExa3-0004Pc-00@optimus>
> Sender: Spam Interceptor <siweb@solidblue.biz>
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:42:31 -0400
>=20
> Dear Brian {Hamilton Kelly},
>=20
> This is Erv Kosch. I am running Spam Interceptor to block spam email and =
viruses. Please follow this link to verify that the message you sent is not=
 spam email.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://si20.com/auth?uid=3Dxxxx&mid=3Dxxx&sid=3Dxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[I've obfuscated the details in the above that were personalized to
myself.]

>=20
> Your email was intercepted because it got a spam rating of 5.4 and I set =
Spam Interceptor to ask everyone who sends me a message rated over 2 to aut=
henticate. When you authenticate I'll receive your email and you'll never h=
ave to authenticate for me again, no matter what spam rating your emails ge=
t.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Erv Kosch

[snip]

--=20
   fix (vb.): 1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view; 2. to
   work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are
   worse than the original problem.  Usage: "Windows ME fixes many of the
   shortcomings of Windows 98 SE".