[Xitami] change of behaviours / bug?

[WhiteShepherd]

I run a busy art site.  I'm currently running Xitami 2.4.d9 with no 
problems (save for "The server is busy" error from time to time).  I 
switched to Xitami 2.5.c0 to see if performance was better.  Less 
server errors but some users got incomplete pages downloading 
from the site.  It seemed to be isolated to a certain version of IE but 
I could not confirm that.  Xitami reported a socket error with each 
broken page.  I switched to 2.4.10 and same error.  2.4.d9 is the 
only version I can use that doesn't "bump" some of my user base.

I posted two questions earlier but got no reply.  Anyone else having 
this problem with the new version?

Gene

On 4 Dec 2003 at 1:09, Jason Ozin at Technica Solutions wrote:

> 
> Updated two of my servers (Win 2000) a few days ago to Xitami 2.5c0 from
> 2.4.d9
> 
> I didn't find any real problems (apart from the fact that the exe's 
had
> changed names - including the one that runs the service).
> 
> But this evening I've realised that the way it handles php pages 
has changed
> completely. The server headers must have changed as all my 
dynamic PHP pages
> are being cached on all platforms!!!  
> 
> Just done a header check and 2.5c0 is passing the modified date 
of the
> actual raw php file in the Last-modified: header as if it were an 
html file.
> This can't be right, can it?!!! 
> 
> Presumably 2.4.d9 didn't do this?
> 
> Adding a line:
> 
> Last-modified:
> 
> to .\headers\header.php doesnt help
> 
> Help please!!! All my sites are now sick.
> 
> 
> Jason Ozin
> Technica Solutions
> 
> 
> --
> Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami