[Xitami] FTP / NAT issues - is ISS better?

[R O]

Thanx for the responses guys, was starting to feel like I had discovered 
some new major bug that no one had done before.  Makes a lot of sense now.  
I am going to look into another FTP service just so I can got off of 
Microshits IIS.

However, I know that the Xitami server is free as well as its bundled FTP 
service, but I think that some more development should start being applied 
to the FTP side.  It would be nice to have a complete package with one 
Xitami load.

Is there anything us Joe users can do to help develop or push the 
development of a more robust FTP Server?  The foundation is already there.

Russel

>From: "Robert E. Schaulis, Sr." <resdad@attbi.com>
>Reply-To: res@null.net
>To: R O <rolinger1@hotmail.com>
>CC: Ewen McNeill <ewen@imatix.com>
>Subject: [Xitami] FTP / NAT issues - is ISS better?
>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:26:44 -0700
>
>Just so you do not think you are alone, I have the same problem - but
>mine started when I added a router into the mix that uses NAT.  Prior to
>that I used a software internet sharing package that worked fine.
>
>I have found no solution so far.  I think the problem may be in FTP
>wanting at least two ports, but why the software sharing handled it I do
>not know.
>
>I have been patiently (and unsuccessfully) waiting for responses to your
>submissions.  I will copy Ewen in case he has ideas or the time to
>respond.
>
>RES
>
>--
>
>Robert E. Schaulis, Sr.
>res@null.net
>http://schaulis.genealogy.org/
>or
>http://res.selfhost.com:6080/www/genindex.htm


Russel P. Olinger
Sr. Technical Consultant
Kessel Corporation
(310) 466-3399
rolinger1@hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com