[Xitami-Dev] Re: Change of architecture in SMT@CVS ?

[KERESZTFALVI Laszlo]

> We have -- as you see -- been working on SMT despite the apparent 
> silence over the last year or two.  smtsock and smttime no longer 
> exist.  Their functions are now carried out inside the kernel itself. 
For me, it was very nice and consistent reaching the Kernel services very
same as all other components (agents). Anyway, SMT is a chained
multi-threading kernel you mention in the doc. Partially, that's why I
have no problem living with the Kernel on the same "level", I was
cooperative ;)

> I'll get someone to post a summary of the changes and how to convert 
> your SMT agents.
That would be nice to see the improvements in one place together! Thanks!

Cheers,
Laszlo

-- 
I don't approve of political jokes...I've seen too many of them get
elected.