= --- === --------------------------------------------------------------------- ======= -L- -I- -B- -E- -R- -E- -T- -T- -O- September 1998 ========= ======= The iMatix Newsletter Volume III Issue 9 --- === --------------------------------------------------------------------- = Copyright (c) 1998 iMatix Corporation - distribute freely Back issues at http://www.imatix.com Comments to: editors@imatix.com Programming -- Technology -- Finite State Machines -- News -- Other Stuff == COMMENT ---...-.-...-.--...-.--...-.-...-.....---..-....--.--..-.-.---.-- Here in Belgium, the end of Summer coincides with the start of the school year, with the return of free and unlimited parking on the autoroutes, and with general relief in the population as people can stop complaining about the lousy Summer weather and start complaining about the lousy Autumn weather. Nothing much happened in August, generally, apart from the fall of the Russian presidency, the onset of the world economic crisis, and signs that terrorists are starting to get nasty again, after two decades of only minor fireworks. This month we're able to bring you the fruit of our Xitami User's Survey, something that would have been impossible before the days of e-mail. Now it was simply a matter of sending out a small questionnaire, then standing back as hundreds of replies flooded our mail system. Thanks to all of you who answered. As well as the many people who replied to the survey, we got a full and varied mailbag. It's one of the pleasures of my job to go through some of these mails, which range from the profoundly interesting to the frankly bizarre. Thanks for all the mails, and keep on enjoying the software! Pieter Hintjens Antwerpen 1 September 1998 == XITAMI USERS SURVEY .-..-..-...----.-.-...---.---...--.----.-..---.-.--.. We sent out about 1400 questionnaires and got 370 responses. To show you the results we've collated the figures back into the original questions: 1 How many months have you been using Xitami? 1a [ 41] Less than 1 month 1b [ 57] 1 to 3 months 1c [ 75] 3 to 6 months 1d [112] 6 to 12 months 1e [ 81] more than a year 2 Used for (please insert an X where appropriate): 2a [106] Intranet, for [] users 2b [ 84] Intranet web applications 2c [214] Testing 2d [205] Internet 2e [ 9] CD-Rom web application 3 Platforms: 3a [134] Windows NT 3b [289] Windows 95 3c [ 32] Linux 3d [ 38] OS/2 3e [ 5] Other Unix 4 Satisfaction: 4a Stability [247] Excellent [ 98] Good [12] Average [ 5] Poor 4b Performance [244] Excellent [105] Good [ 9] Average [ 0] Poor 4c Documentation [ 94] Excellent [175] Good [73] Average [17] Poor 4d Support [157] Excellent [137] Good [33] Average [ 6] Poor 4e Ease-of-use [207] Excellent [121] Good [24] Average [ 4] Poor 4f Functionality [155] Excellent [163] Good [38] Average [ 1] Poor 4g Rate of improvement [130] Excellent [169] Good [41] Average [ 2] Poor 4h imatix.com website [ 77] Excellent [204] Good [59] Average [ 5] Poor Of the 1400 people polled, 66 run an Internet website (we'll be adding a page to imatix.com with these links). We know that there are about 500 Internet sites that use Xitami, so a quick application of data-sleuthing techniques lets us estimate that there are about 10,000 Xitami users out there. We're assuming that anyone who is serious enough to use Xitami for an Internet web site would respond to the survey, and be glad to be listed on our site. The results of the survey are interesting. Clearly many people have a hard time with the documentation. We also received a large number of excellent ideas for changes and improvements. The person (who will remain nameless, Bill) who asked that Xitami be supplied with an espresso, English-style toast (one side only) and a French maid should be ashamed. Everyone knows that Belgian waffles are far superior to English toast. We promised a free copy of Xitami/Pro (Xitami's big brother, which supports the Secure Sockets Layer) to one respondent chosen at random. So, we cut-out the little 'From:' lines in each mail, put the whole lot into a hat, and asked the concierge, Harry, to pull one out. Okay, in truth we wrote a small Perl script as a snip-n-hat Harry simulator, but the results were just as impressive. The proud (we hope) winner of a Xitami/Pro is Dan Nitescu . == FEEDBACK -..-.-.-.--....-.-.-.--..-...-.--.-....-.-.--...-.-.-.----.-.--- On the follies of large projects... From: "Noyes, Robert D (PB-rdnoyes)" To: "'Pieter Hintjens'" Subject: RE: Liberetto III/8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Your observations in the Libretto III/8 are brilliant, take it from another who has "been there." Monty Python would be amazed at how smart "those Belgies" are! It's always a pleasure getting the Libretto; keep it coming. L8R >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No comment. :| From: Lennart.Borgman@draco.se.astra.com To: info@imatix.com Subject: XML explained ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I read your article about XML in Volume III/4 or Libretto. Thanx for finally making me understand what XML is good for. Who needs MS Word doc format now that we have XML? Not even Bill I guess. - Lennart - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On SMT and Libero... From: John Totten To: Libero@isonline.com Subject: Telephony ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyone using Libero for telephony apps? John Totten Sitka AK From: john eikenberry To: smt@imatix.com Subject: Python wrapper for SMT? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I recently discovered your SMT kernel and after reading a bit about it have gotten the idea that it would make a great part of a software agent development environment I'm working on. I'm implementing my system in Python, and thought about trying to use Swig to generate a python wrapper for SMT. I was hoping that someone there might be wiling to pass along some thoughts on this idea. This would be my first use of Swig, and I have cetain reservations about how closely SMT is tied to Libero. --- John Eikenberry From: Dave_Kirby@3com.com To: info@imatix.com Subject: Please add me to Liberetto mailing list ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Firstly please add me to your Liberetto mailing list - I was on it a couple of years ago (at a different email address), but for some reason I stopped receiving it after a few months. I have just downloaded and started playing with Xitami - great stuff. I am glad to see you have included examples in Python. It is my current language of choice and deserves far wider coverage. Talking of Python has anyone done a Libero schema for the language yet? I may attempt one myself if no one else has, though I can see there could be problems with Python's method of using indentation to delimit blocks, though I haven't looked at schemas closely enough to tell how limiting this would be. Regards, Dave Kirby From: fredrik.thornblad@bfs.bofors.se (Fredrik Thoernblad) To: ph@imatix.com Subject: Libero ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi! I have just managed to persuade our computer department to download your product Libero. (They haven't managed to install it correctly yet, but that's another question). I heard about Libero a week or two ago when someone in comp.lang.ada asked for a tool for creating state machines. Someone suggested Libero, but also stated that it didn't yet support Ada. He also made a hint that you might produce Ada support if someone asked for it... Well, here I am, asking for it! As a mostly military company we make much of our software in Ada and freqently use state machines. Now it's mostly up to the hacker himself how the state machine is implemented and I think that a tool for generating them would be useful to us. I haven't had time to look that much into what Libero produces (mostly since they haven't installed it correctly yet, but I downloaded the win-version at home and had a quick look). One thing that I didn't find was a graphical view of the complete state machine (not just current state and next) with all the states and transitions. That's something to consider for future versions. Please let me know if you have the intention to make Ada support for Libero. And I would also like to have Ada 83 compatibility since we still use that in some projects. Regards, Fredrik Thörnblad Systems developement Bofors Missiles AB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your mail about Libero. From what you say about frequently using state machines, Libero would be a useful tool for your work. Certainly it provides a single syntax for state machines that is language-independent and can easily be shared between developers and teams. You will find that it makes FSM programs much more maintainable than previously, and provides a high-level design that can be provided as part of the formal program specifications. It's true that the Windows GUI does not show a overview of all the states, but frankly, this is something we consider to be way too complex for what it's worth. The single-state view is both simple and effective, especially since a state is the logical unit of work in a FSM design. An overall design is as useful as a full printout of a long program. I.e. it can be impressive but does not say very much. As regards Ada support: a competent Ada programmer can make this in less than a day, by adapting one of the existing schemas. I forget whether Ada supports constructs like the C #include statement, and statically-assigned arrays, but presumably it does. You can probably start from the C or C++ schemas. In general it's a matter of hand-translating the schema code, then generating code and seeing that it compiles. Use a simple test case such as the expression evaluator that comes with Libero. When you've developed an Ada schema, you'll be able to tailor it for various versions of Ada, either with separate schemas, or by using conditional options in a single schema, as we do for Cobol. In any case, we'll be glad to assist in this work, and to include any eventual Ada schema in the standard Libero distribution. From: "Brett Hardcastle" To: "Pieter Hintjens" Subject: Drumbeat 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Will Xitami work with Drumbeat 2.0 from Elemental Software? I must say that Xitami is my server of choice, however there is a growing need to build database-driven websites (as they are no doubt the real sites of tomorrow), and since I am NOT a programmer, the newer programs such as Cold Fusion and Drumbeat are at least one answer to my web development needs. Drumbeat (probably owned by Microsoft), as you probably know, is set up to work easily with Access and ODBC. Since I have never been enamored with either MS Personal Web Server or Information Server, I am hoping that there is compatibility with Xitami. Best Regards, Brett Hardcastle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, database-driven websites (or, put another way, web-based business applications) are indeed an important part of the future. We are looking at a number of ways to access simple ODBC databases from within Xitami; for serious work, we also make a web-based development tool, iMatix Studio. See http://www.imatix.com/pub/info/twp9801.zip. From: Jonathan Story To: info@imatix.com Subject: OS/2 versions of SFL and SMT? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I am about to make use of Libero in at least one application (it looks very good -- I'm surprised it doesn't get more mention in the newsgroups.) Since the first application is multi-threaded, I *might* have considered using SMT, except that OS/2 was not mentioned as a platform to which it was ported. Now, I'm not asking that you consider doing this (Libero seems to be sufficient), but I am curious: you have Xitami ported to OS/2, and, as I understand it, Xitami uses SFL and SMT. Does some OS/2 version in fact exist? Finally, what kind of thinking are you doing about making a Java version of Libero? I suppose at this time it might be more an intellectual curiousity than an actual tool, but in time -- when Java moves into mission critical areas -- it could find its stride. The well-known advantage, of course, is that you wouldn't/shouldn't need a separate version for each operating system. Good work! Jonathan Story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a Java version of Libero, SMT runs just fine on OS/2, and Xitami does too. And yes, it's a shame that Libero does not get as much coverage as it deserves. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On Htmlpp... To: ph@imatix.com From: The Happy Smiling Silver Family Subject: HTMLPP ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I've just been trying out HTMLPP and I'm impressed. I had been writing my pages in SHTML and pulling them through a server to create the final version (including common navigation bars, etc). Your code has solved all of that. Thanx for a great code and thanx for taking the time to read this. -- Alan Silver Prestwich Smile Gemach http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Hills/6749 == WEB SITE STATISTICS -..-..--..-..----...-.-...---.-..-.-..-..----..-..--- Once more, the latest figures from www.imatix.com: Program started at Sun-Aug-30-1998 05:49 local time. Analyzed requests from Fri-Jul-31-1998 23:57 to Sun-Aug-30-1998 00:24 (29.0 days). Total successful requests: 299,867 (67,857) Average successful requests per day: 10,333 (9,693) Total successful requests for pages: 59,484 (12,908) Average successful requests for pages per day: 2,050 (1,844) Total failed requests: 958 (198) Total redirected requests: 153 (33) Number of distinct files requested: 930 (886) Number of distinct hosts served: 16,176 (4,163) Number of new hosts served in last 7 days: 3,367 Corrupt logfile lines: 283 Unwanted logfile entries: 10 Total data transferred (in Megabytes): 7868 Mbytes (1729 Mbytes) Average data transferred per day: 284 Mbytes (259 Mbytes) (Figures in parentheses refer to the last 7 days). Weekly Report week beg.: #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: --------- ----- ------ ---------- ------ Jul/26/98: 8283: 2.76%: 242615111: 2.94%: Aug/ 2/98: 74952: 25.00%: 2083932942: 25.26%: Aug/ 9/98: 77728: 25.92%: 2099402229: 25.44%: Aug/16/98: 69788: 23.27%: 1969869746: 23.87%: Aug/23/98: 69075: 23.04%: 1854195677: 22.47%: Aug/30/98: 41: 0.01%: 765279: 0.01%: Daily Summary day: #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: --- ----- ------ ---------- ------ Sun: 33708: 11.24%: 913658068: 11.07%: Mon: 44533: 14.85%: 1162808935: 14.09%: Tue: 48074: 16.03%: 1291939142: 15.66%: Wed: 51594: 17.21%: 1519911289: 18.42%: Thu: 44975: 15.00%: 1197898286: 14.52%: Fri: 41738: 13.92%: 1150857981: 13.95%: Sat: 35245: 11.75%: 1013707283: 12.29%: Daily Report date: #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: --------- ----- ------ --------- ------ Jul/31/98: 19: 0.01%: 56548: : Aug/ 1/98: 8264: 2.76%: 242558563: 2.94%: Aug/ 2/98: 9917: 3.31%: 260846962: 3.16%: Aug/ 3/98: 11866: 3.96%: 306648028: 3.72%: Aug/ 4/98: 11920: 3.98%: 338459043: 4.10%: Aug/ 5/98: 11661: 3.89%: 338336763: 4.10%: Aug/ 6/98: 11581: 3.86%: 328333764: 3.98%: Aug/ 7/98: 10632: 3.55%: 288823874: 3.50%: Aug/ 8/98: 7375: 2.46%: 222484508: 2.70%: Aug/ 9/98: 8487: 2.83%: 238429224: 2.89%: Aug/10/98: 10387: 3.46%: 281500450: 3.41%: Aug/11/98: 14301: 4.77%: 366605609: 4.44%: Aug/12/98: 14801: 4.94%: 409293546: 4.96%: Aug/13/98: 11482: 3.83%: 308038011: 3.73%: Aug/14/98: 11019: 3.67%: 290492001: 3.52%: Aug/15/98: 7251: 2.42%: 205043388: 2.49%: Aug/16/98: 7602: 2.54%: 211975916: 2.57%: Aug/17/98: 11279: 3.76%: 264749109: 3.21%: Aug/18/98: 11012: 3.67%: 308048415: 3.73%: Aug/19/98: 12430: 4.15%: 431397588: 5.23%: Aug/20/98: 11227: 3.74%: 292413728: 3.54%: Aug/21/98: 10006: 3.34%: 291039569: 3.53%: Aug/22/98: 6232: 2.08%: 170245421: 2.06%: Aug/23/98: 7661: 2.55%: 201640687: 2.44%: Aug/24/98: 11001: 3.67%: 309911348: 3.76%: Aug/25/98: 10841: 3.62%: 278826075: 3.38%: Aug/26/98: 12702: 4.24%: 340883392: 4.13%: Aug/27/98: 10685: 3.56%: 269112783: 3.26%: Aug/28/98: 10062: 3.36%: 280445989: 3.40%: Aug/29/98: 6123: 2.04%: 173375403: 2.10%: Aug/30/98: 41: 0.01%: 765279: 0.01%: Hourly Summary hr: #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: -- ----- ------ --------- ------ 0: 11322: 3.78%: 306862522: 3.72%: 1: 10660: 3.55%: 274555546: 3.33%: 2: 11410: 3.81%: 336639621: 4.08%: 3: 11067: 3.69%: 340806057: 4.13%: 4: 10996: 3.67%: 338184842: 4.10%: 5: 14031: 4.68%: 394085775: 4.78%: 6: 14295: 4.77%: 373486362: 4.53%: 7: 15550: 5.19%: 410297693: 4.97%: 8: 15729: 5.25%: 458687777: 5.56%: 9: 15652: 5.22%: 383604255: 4.65%: 10: 14327: 4.78%: 415065525: 5.03%: 11: 13802: 4.60%: 400009328: 4.85%: 12: 15141: 5.05%: 368532799: 4.47%: 13: 15077: 5.03%: 407240231: 4.94%: 14: 13752: 4.59%: 384304999: 4.66%: 15: 13789: 4.60%: 374374111: 4.54%: 16: 10954: 3.65%: 302876126: 3.67%: 17: 11467: 3.82%: 294148907: 3.57%: 18: 10473: 3.49%: 331292916: 4.02%: 19: 11341: 3.78%: 294317314: 3.57%: 20: 10637: 3.55%: 301785391: 3.66%: 21: 8634: 2.88%: 233462775: 2.83%: 22: 9303: 3.10%: 231899300: 2.81%: 23: 10458: 3.49%: 294260812: 3.57%: Domain Report Printing all domains, sorted by number of requests. #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: domain ----- ------ ---------- ------ ------ 69576: 23.20%: 1670448669: 20.25%: .com (Commercial, mainly USA) 58212: 19.41%: 1721731673: 20.87%: [unresolved numerical addresses] 53827: 17.95%: 1369848173: 16.60%: .net (Network) 19407: 6.47%: 675361129: 8.19%: .de (Germany) 9512: 3.17%: 190067128: 2.30%: .ca (Canada) 9320: 3.11%: 214025797: 2.59%: .edu (USA Educational) 5915: 1.97%: 135041910: 1.64%: .uk (United Kingdom) 5792: 1.93%: 195497251: 2.37%: .fr (France) 5205: 1.74%: 277732702: 3.37%: .br (Brazil) 5010: 1.67%: 130221344: 1.58%: .se (Sweden) 4936: 1.65%: 134079195: 1.63%: .au (Australia) 4472: 1.49%: 110513986: 1.34%: .nl (Netherlands) 4117: 1.37%: 93144020: 1.13%: .it (Italy) 3143: 1.05%: 56607760: 0.69%: .jp (Japan) 2513: 0.84%: 70513202: 0.85%: .kr (South Korea) 2230: 0.74%: 62798589: 0.76%: .ch (Switzerland) 2165: 0.72%: 60358082: 0.73%: .es (Spain) 2126: 0.71%: 59053065: 0.72%: .no (Norway) 2043: 0.68%: 69219745: 0.84%: .at (Austria) 1977: 0.66%: 93797346: 1.14%: .ru (Russian Federation) 1951: 0.65%: 44751400: 0.54%: .dk (Denmark) 1813: 0.60%: 94043713: 1.14%: .pl (Poland) 1790: 0.60%: 37285638: 0.45%: .fi (Finland) 1562: 0.52%: 41833820: 0.51%: .org (Non-Profit Making Organisations) 1352: 0.45%: 54898550: 0.67%: .sg (Singapore) 1280: 0.43%: 39305975: 0.48%: .be (Belgium) 1146: 0.38%: 21117180: 0.26%: .nz (New Zealand) 1104: 0.37%: 27817746: 0.34%: .my (Malaysia) 983: 0.33%: 25743970: 0.31%: .hu (Hungary) 982: 0.33%: 28495686: 0.35%: .gov (USA Government) 914: 0.30%: 16429358: 0.20%: .us (United States) 893: 0.30%: 20900984: 0.25%: .il (Israel) 861: 0.29%: 32012713: 0.39%: .th (Thailand) 798: 0.27%: 17916063: 0.22%: .mil (USA Military) 718: 0.24%: 26752520: 0.32%: .id (Indonesia) 691: 0.23%: 18747093: 0.23%: .hk (Hong Kong) 658: 0.22%: 25511864: 0.31%: .mx (Mexico) 618: 0.21%: 18147515: 0.22%: .cz (Czech Republic) 591: 0.20%: 18125296: 0.22%: .pt (Portugal) 585: 0.20%: 27795703: 0.34%: .za (South Africa) 471: 0.16%: 8078035: 0.10%: .ie (Ireland) 430: 0.14%: 17845050: 0.22%: .ar (Argentina) 421: 0.14%: 9371930: 0.11%: .cl (Chile) 397: 0.13%: 4401723: 0.05%: .si (Slovenia) 369: 0.12%: 12515812: 0.15%: .tw (Taiwan) 352: 0.12%: 14467947: 0.18%: .gr (Greece) 338: 0.11%: 16141288: 0.20%: .ua (Ukraine) 293: 0.10%: 11695695: 0.14%: .su (Former USSR) 269: 0.09%: 7016557: 0.09%: .yu (Yugoslavia) 258: 0.09%: 9935949: 0.12%: .arpa (Old style Arpanet) 254: 0.08%: 6909233: 0.08%: .ph (Philippines) 249: 0.08%: 12641247: 0.15%: .uy (Uruguay) 247: 0.08%: 7152873: 0.09%: .tr (Turkey) 209: 0.07%: 4013178: 0.05%: .int (International) 200: 0.07%: 4533124: 0.05%: .in (India) 189: 0.06%: 6012275: 0.07%: .co (Colombia) 167: 0.06%: 7511509: 0.09%: .lv (Latvia) 166: 0.06%: 2495081: 0.03%: .sk (Slovak Republic) 163: 0.05%: 7103022: 0.09%: .ro (Romania) 137: 0.05%: 3999619: 0.05%: .is (Iceland) 131: 0.04%: 1220073: 0.01%: .jm (Jamaica) 128: 0.04%: 9932844: 0.12%: .hr (Croatia) 109: 0.04%: 1643663: 0.02%: .ee (Estonia) 106: 0.04%: 5792315: 0.07%: .bg (Bulgaria) 96: 0.03%: 1844059: 0.02%: .tt (Trinidad and Tobago) 95: 0.03%: 1405736: 0.02%: .lt (Lithuania) 89: 0.03%: 1416941: 0.02%: .cn (China) 75: 0.03%: 788674: 0.01%: .pe (Peru) 74: 0.02%: 1310215: 0.02%: .pr (Puerto Rico) 64: 0.02%: 2326516: 0.03%: .cy (Cyprus) 61: 0.02%: 2277114: 0.03%: .lu (Luxembourg) 57: 0.02%: 1460106: 0.02%: .ke (Kenya) 53: 0.02%: 1402710: 0.02%: [unknown] 47: 0.02%: 1890597: 0.02%: .by (Belarus) 41: 0.01%: 1123855: 0.01%: .mu (Mauritius) 35: 0.01%: 767663: 0.01%: .nu (Niue) 34: 0.01%: 1092572: 0.01%: .gb (Great Britain) 32: 0.01%: 118343: : .do (Dominican Republic) 27: 0.01%: 1364714: 0.02%: .cr (Costa Rica) 26: 0.01%: 130312: : .ad (Andorra) 24: 0.01%: 941822: 0.01%: .bo (Bolivia) 24: 0.01%: 98803: : .eg (Egypt) 18: 0.01%: 718397: 0.01%: .pk (Pakistan) 16: 0.01%: 1219316: 0.01%: .mt (Malta) 10: : 447158: 0.01%: .gt (Guatemala) 7: : 1904204: 0.02%: .ve (Venezuela) 5: : 44103: : .am (Armenia) 5: : 21423: : .om (Oman) 2: : 87024: : .bh (Bahrain) 2: : 1261826: 0.02%: .kz (Kazakhstan) 2: : 650106: 0.01%: .mk (Macedonia) 2: : 641914: 0.01%: .ni (Nicaragua) 2: : 1267444: 0.02%: .sa (Saudi Arabia) 1: : 633722: 0.01%: .tj (Tadjikistan) File Type Report #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: extension ------ ------ ---------- ------ --------- 219279: 73.13%: 592337399: 7.18%: .gif 45571: 15.20%: 965406599: 11.70%: .htm 13913: 4.64%: 73725847: 0.89%: (directories) 9726: 3.24%: 4014232554: 48.65%: .exe 8440: 2.81%: 2301155234: 27.89%: .zip 1375: 0.46%: 21847219: 0.26%: .txt 1078: 0.36%: 277553991: 3.36%: .tgz 192: 0.06%: 600249: 0.01%: .class 54: 0.02%: 104647: : (no extension) 48: 0.02%: 577402: 0.01%: .mod 44: 0.01%: 930913: 0.01%: .pl 36: 0.01%: 513534: 0.01%: .cpp 33: 0.01%: 452344: 0.01%: .c 27: 0.01%: 293540: : .bas 20: 0.01%: 690638: 0.01%: .cob 17: 0.01%: 297302: : .asm 13: : 61369: : .java 1: : 203: : .cfg Request Report Printing the top requested archives, sorted by number of requests. #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: file ----- ------ ---------- ------ ---- 5284: 1.76%: 2482959660: 30.09%: /pub/xitami/xiw3223d.exe 1386: 0.46%: 484165607: 5.87%: /pub/xitami/xiw3223d.zip 989: 0.33%: 244593297: 2.96%: /pub/xitami/xiw3221c.exe 890: 0.30%: 368067587: 4.46%: /pub/xitami/xic3223d.exe 732: 0.24%: 345926719: 4.19%: /pub/xitami/xis3223d.exe 462: 0.15%: 204546839: 2.48%: /pub/xitami/xiw3223b.exe 424: 0.14%: 93527735: 1.13%: /pub/libero/bin/lrmswin.zip 396: 0.13%: 83370521: 1.01%: /pub/xitami/xic3221c.exe 390: 0.13%: 137877368: 1.67%: /pub/xitami/xic3223d.zip 373: 0.12%: 95723585: 1.16%: /pub/libero/bin/lrmswins.zip 369: 0.12%: 311475692: 3.78%: /pub/xitami/xswin23d.zip 348: 0.12%: 111796515: 1.35%: /pub/sfl/src/sflsrc19.zip 341: 0.11%: 30078858: 0.36%: /pub/tools/htmlp40g.zip 338: 0.11%: 112009853: 1.36%: /pub/xitami/xiw3223c.exe 300: 0.10%: 105534993: 1.28%: /pub/xitami/xis3223d.zip 258: 0.09%: 93417519: 1.13%: /pub/libero/doc/lrhtml.zip 247: 0.08%: 17156191: 0.21%: /pub/libero/doc/lrfull.zip 237: 0.08%: 144317081: 1.75%: /pub/xitami/xiuni23d.tgz 207: 0.07%: 49507322: 0.60%: /pub/libero/example/complete.zip 188: 0.06%: 59184175: 0.72%: /pub/info/twp9801.zip Referrer Report Printing the top referring URLs, sorted by number of requests. (Excluding iMatix URLs) #reqs: URL ------ --- 1862: http://www.winfiles.com/apps/98/servers-websrv.html 392: http://www.winfiles.com/apps/nt/servers-websrv.html 351: http://serverwatch.internet.com/webserver-xitami.html 303: http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/6293/source-cpp.htm 254: http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Canyon/5829/index4.html 187: http://www.freecode.com/cgi-bin/viewproduct.pl?4379 185: http://personal.sip.fi/~lm/c2txt2c/ 176: http://members.xoom.com/flawolverine/ip's.htm 153: http://www.genitor.com/resources/librarie.htm 150: http://www.download.com/PC/Result/Download/0,21,0-50436,00.html?st.d 133: http://mitec.softseek.com/Internet/Web_Publishing_Tools/Servers/Revi 130: http://serverwatch.internet.com/top10.html 102: http://www.angelfire.com/sc/electron/ 100: http://members.xoom.com/kkross/servidor.html 96: http://www.terravista.ciclone.com.br/albufeira/1567/dowloads.htm 93: http://www.softseek.com/Internet/Web_Publishing_Tools/Servers/Review 88: http://webcompare.internet.com/ 85: http://reference.perl.com/query.cgi?cgi 80: http://nng.simplenet.com/servd32.html 73: http://www.davecentral.com/2426.html 72: http://www.heise.de/ct/shareware/ct9814/uk68.shtml 67: http://www.infogoal.com/cbd/cbdtol.htm 64: http://freeloader.simplenet.com/win95index.html 64: http://serverwatch.internet.com/webreview-xitami.html 63: http://members.xoom.com/badwolf/down1.html 59: http://www.freecode.com/cgi-bin/viewproduct.pl?2426 57: http://tucows.tierranet.com/server95.html 54: http://www.pheared.com/nonags/servd32.html 53: http://207.92.100.8/ Browser Summary Printing the first 20 browsers, sorted by number of requests. #reqs: %reqs: bytes: %bytes: browser ------ ------ ---------- ------ ------- 156406: 52.24%: 3969328346: 48.28%: Netscape 133604: 44.62%: 3381209994: 41.13%: Netscape (compatible) 2473: 0.83%: 103983908: 1.26%: Teleport Pro 1840: 0.61%: 517706207: 6.30%: GetRight 440: 0.15%: 31584064: 0.38%: Lynx 408: 0.14%: 3593900: 0.04%: NetAttache Light 1.1 240: 0.08%: 21734943: 0.26%: Wget 200: 0.07%: 37516836: 0.46%: Web Downloader 189: 0.06%: 53956871: 0.66%: Net_Vampire 164: 0.05%: : : SiteMill 146: 0.05%: 23804: : MSProxy 137: 0.05%: 1123968: 0.01%: Netmind-Minder 136: 0.05%: 4923597: 0.06%: WebZIP 122: 0.04%: 1983922: 0.02%: Konqueror 110: 0.04%: 615531: 0.01%: TE 106: 0.04%: 2911327: 0.04%: IBM-WebExplorer-DLL 105: 0.04%: 196700: : Mosaic 91: 0.03%: : : CNET_Snoop 88: 0.03%: 1074238: 0.01%: EmailSiphon 86: 0.03%: 1140706: 0.01%: OmniWeb == TERMINATE THE PROGRAM -...---...-..----....-.---..---...-...---.-...---.- To stop receiving these newsletters, reply with 'remove' in the subject.